Due to slippery fingers and a lack of attention, all comments for this blog were deleted. (I am losing my mind, I don’t even know *when* I deleted them.) Please don’t take it amiss or as a sign. It’s only an accident.

http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com

go there. laugh.

not always work safe.

Hubba hubba. No wait, I’m not there yet.

Most of us have read Midsummer Night’s Dream (aka MND to save my poor fingers). It’s a good story, full of comedy and romance; a favorite of many people. Prior to 2008, I’ve seen two different productions of it here at OSF, in fact, each very very good. That said, we haven’t seen anything like this production before.

It’s all about the sex. and passion. and love. and hormones (oh, you cannot forget the hormones.) yum.

We open with the Duke of Athens and his soon-to-be Amazon wife. In silver sharkskin, seated on huge (12 feet at the top) over-stuffed thrones like curvy check marks. His dark glasses shield his eyes from the glitter of the heavy gold chains around his neck. Yes, the Duke is a 50s New Jersey wise guy speaking Elizabethean English spoken in that specific accent. Hippolyta’s response, in an Eartha Kitt-like growl-purr sets the sexual heat thrumming. We’re laughing and turned on — how often does that happen in public?

The young lovers are brimming with adolescent hormones. It’s easy to see how sneaking off to elope in the woods on the night of a full moon is a better idea than marrying the one you don’t love. (Its a great plot device if totally impractical.) If the old lovers (ugh, what a thing to say) are the 50s, then these kids are the 60s. Early 60s. You can almost hear the Beatles and the Birds playing their songs as they dance around in their basic white outfits, the girls in minidresses and the boys in … well . . . collared shirts and slacks.

The play-within-a-play group of fools rolls onstage in . . . a dayglo VW bus, complete with flower power sigils and rocking out to 70s rock-n-roll. (and was that a haze of maryjane smoke?).

But the joy, the thing that makes this play come ALIVE, are the fairies. Because they are fairies — raunchy, sexy, gorgeous young men in tight fishnet shirts, leggings, 4-in high rubbersoled boots and . . . tutus. Moth comes into the dark night and flirts with a spotlight as the music goes 80s and he . . . vogues. All of them come out and play: think chorus line gone 80s. But the scene stealer is John Tufts playing a truly devilish and delightful Puck. Gorgeous!

Mincing and menacing all at once, they steal (most of) the young lover’s clothes and are horrified when Titiana falls in love with . . . an ass! Sulky agreement accompanies their duties to Bottom as he calls for sweet hay and a soft place to nuzzle. Kevin Kennerly’s Oberon is darn good (a little overplayed, but thats in comparison to the excellent actors around him) and Linda Alper’s strident mother act (he’s stealing my B-a-a-a-a-by!) performance is perfect.

We laughed, we danced in our seats, we had a truly magnificent time. This is the best performance of MND I have ever seen, and in the top ten (in 12 years) at OSF.

The Clay Cart is a 2000 year old play originally written in sanskrit. The description thrilled me: “Bursting with music and dance, color, action, and romance . . .” and I was eager to see what the always-innovative OSF created for our delectation. Sadly, it was disappointing.

The acting was good, the staging exquisite. The production clearly treats the audience as another person in the play, consistently breaking the ‘fourth wall’ and using innovative prop devices (such as walls made of people and pillows and a portrait made of the actor holding an empty frame (see photo)) to involve and engage us. The scene design is innovative in it’s luxurious spareness (actors stand up from their pillows at the edge of the stage to hold sticks at waist level to represent doors) and there is a deft touch of comedic lightness in most scenes. It was fun to watch.

But the story is hard to get truly engaged in. It’s definitely Shakespearean in its flavor — a story that juxtaposes romance and political upheaval, characters that span all strata of society, lovers kept apart by the opposition of others and by the escalation of unlikely circumstance. I can see why it was chosen this year, Bill Rauch’s inaugural year as the artistic director (Rauch has directed this play in various incarnations previously). I found myself just not caring about whether the noble but now penniless Brahamin succeeded in taking the good-hearted courtesan as his second wife, winning her free from the truly awful King’s brother in law. Somewhere in there a Brahimin thief is redeemed by buying the courtesan’s slave girl and making her his (free) wife, and both the evil king and his evil brother in law are overthrown by the secret king in exile.

This performance gets an A for execution and a D for story — an overall C production.

Othello is a difficult play for the modern woman — most of the time we just rage “why don’t the two of them just talk to each other fer chrissakes?!” Desdemona is often portrayed as naive and just a little stupid (careless inbreeding?) while Othello himself is a savage, incapable of reasoning and overly emotional.

In 1999 I saw a production of Othello here at OSF that blew me away. I disgraced myself in that I spoke out loud (and quite loudly) towards the end of the second act “I get it!” For the first time I saw Othello as a man in love for the first time, and just like any callow adolescent he was completely unable to make rational decisions about his emotions. Like a deaf man who suddenly has his hearing restored, the emotions are overwhelming. When they are positive — as they are early on in all new relationships — he is effusive and glories in how good it feels to be in love. But when things begin to go sour he has no prior experience to tell him this is normal, it will pass, it will get better. Finally, Othello made sense.

Nearly a decade later, Othello is back at OSF. This production took a different tack: Othello is mad.

The play itself provides for this interpretation: Othello falls down in an epileptic fit after being told that Cassio has confessed to having sex with Desdemona (apparently this line is frequently cut, I didn’t remember it from previous versions I’d seen), his demeanor gets increasingly ‘twitchy’ and he makes abrupt gestures as his speech becomes increasingly ragged. Ironically, his clothing becomes neater and more dapper as the play moves on. An indication of OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder)? Peter Macon plays Othello with expansiveness and joy. Its nearly painful to see this goodhearted, ferocious warrior turn into a man tormented by his own dark jealousy. It’s clear, however, that his jealousy comes from his own lack of self-esteem when dealing with ‘civilized’ people (“Rude am I in my speech / And little blessed with the soft phrase of peace” Act I, Scene 3, 81–82.)

Iago . . . that gleaming icon of evil is a delight to watch. Played by Dan Donohue with sly deviltry and exquisite timing, Iago turns out to be a a lot funnier than we’re used to seeing (Donohue’s physical acting is some of the best in the company). As always, the audience is left to wonder at his motive’s — is all of this *really* from being passed over by Othello in favor of ‘untried’ but clever Cassio? Here, we are given a glimpse that jealousy (ah symmetry!) may be also a factor in Iago’s hatred of the moor: “’twixt my sheets … (the Moor has done my office” Act I, Scene 3, 393–394.”

Desdemona is not Shakepeare’s best creations, but Sarah Rutan does her best, playing her with strength and a deep love for this foreign man that never falters, even when he kills her. Her physical acting was also superb, the body language matching the emotions and words generated with exquisite appropriateness.

This is a play of contrasts: Othello strides about in tight-fitting clothing in dark colors that he covers over with a gorgeous (sensual) robe in sunlight gold and (at the end) a cream-colored overcoat. Iago wears only gleaming black leather from his long overcoat to his boots. Briefly we see him in a plain linen shirt over his breeches, but that is quickly discarded for a bare torso as the action roars to its death-filled end. The final image, in fact, is nearly cinematic in its effect: the newlyweds lie upon one another in the marriage bed, wounded Cassio stands to the left, having just ordered Iago away to be tortured. Iago turns and moves to center stage, his reddish hair blond in the light, his skin milk pale under his overcoat, and the blood of his fresh wound drawing the eye into what suddenly seems like the only color on the stage.

Iago takes a half step forward, reaches out and the lights go out.

You are Dr. Doom

Dr. Doom 70% Green Goblin 64% Lex Luthor 62% Mr. Freeze 56% Apocalypse 52% Kingpin 49% The Joker 48% Catwoman 48% Poison Ivy 47% Magneto 43% Dark Phoenix 39% Venom 36% Riddler 36% Juggernaut 32% Mystique 28% Two-Face 28% Blessed with smarts and power but burdened by vanity. Click here to take the “Which Super Villain are you?” quiz…

Small white flowers, bunchy green leaves . . . my favorite groundcover, and perfect for growing in containers full of otherwise taller plants.

This year I planted a bunch of allyssium from the nursery, but also bought a couple of packets of seeds (as well as a packet of delphinium seeds) because I wondered if could grow my own. This is, btw, the seductive power of gardening. The weather’s been cold and I didn’t get around to planting any when I planted my containers a couple of months ago, but I did take advantage of a warmish day (above 60) last week and sprinkled the seeds into the top layer of dirt in a variety of containers that were looking sparse.

Lo and behold! Sprouts!

pictures to be posted later — gotta wait till morning to take them.

. . .  but worth it.

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/17/tesla-whitestar-electric-sedan-to-debut-this-year/

This car is gorgeous (yes, I have a ‘thing’ for muscle cars and sports cars, have for years) and since it is 100% electric it is incredibly low cost to maintain. 0-60 in less than 4 seconds, 135 mpg equivalent and 222 miles per charge. What’s not to like?

The price: $50k-$60k. OUCH.

But then I think about how much gas and maintenance costs and I start doing the math. Our car (a 2001 Nissan Sentra) hit the 100k mile mark last year, so we are planning on a) increased maintenance and repair costs and b) that it will go about five years more before *needing* to be replaced. We currently spend about $45/week on gas and another $100 for oil etc. changes every 3 months.

A new car would reduce our gas consumption a bit, but not dramatically (unless we get a hybrid, of course); it will also cost us a monthly payment that we currently don’t have to make. Say a new (non-Tesla) car costs $30k, that’s a $20k difference. Presuming our maintenance is the same, and our car payments the same (not likely, but it makes the math easier), at $45/week savings, it will take 8.5 years to make up the difference. That’s too long. If the Tesla only cost $40k, however, it would only be 4.3 years. THAT is a number I can appreciate and support.